The measure is set to launch in one year, in October 2026, and will be a “world first.” Singapore plans to add a surcharge to all passengers departing from its airport. The goal? To better finance the development and use of sustainable aviation fuels, commonly known as SAF, which should eventually power aircraft from all airlines to limit the environmental impact of civil aviation.
Carbon Neutrality by 2050
This means that everyone flying out of Singapore (excluding transit passengers) from October 1, 2026, will have to pay slightly more for their ticket to feed a special fund. This fund will allow the city-state’s authorities to purchase more sustainable fuel for Changi Airport. In the short term, the goal is for at least 1% of the aviation fuel used there to be sustainable by next year, rising to 5% by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. It’s an ambitious project, but certainly achievable for those familiar with Singapore and how it operates. For passengers, the amount of this new tax will vary based on distance traveled and cabin class. Basically, it could amount to around $6-7 for a flight to Europe for someone traveling in economy class. Not necessarily huge on its own, but given Changi’s traffic (67.7 million passengers in 2024), the sums add up. Air freight and business flights will also be affected.
What Exactly Is SAF?
Even though the product is relatively new and its use still limited compared to demand, the fact is we’re hearing more and more about Sustainable Aviation Fuel in air transport. What’s called SAF (Sustainable Aviation Fuel) is a type of alternative fuel used in aircraft and certified as sustainable by independent, internationally recognized bodies. With physical and chemical characteristics similar to traditional aviation kerosene, this new fuel’s advantage is that it can completely replace or be mixed with conventional fuel without difficulty or risk. And all this without requiring any modifications to aircraft engines. In short, it’s a substitute or complementary fuel for all commercial and cargo fleets worldwide. Its main advantage is being much “cleaner” than what currently exists. Without going into too much detail, SAF offers several benefits: – It reduces CO2 emissions (and some other pollutants) significantly in aviation; from 75% to 100% compared to traditional kerosene. – It’s produced from renewable raw materials and/or non-food waste (vegetable oils, animal fats, forestry waste, algae, etc.). – It doesn’t require modifications to either aircraft or airport infrastructure to be used. The only drawback, for now, is a higher production cost compared to fossil kerosene, which somewhat slows its development. Hence Singapore’s idea to find new funding for its production. Why not, after all?
